Markets on Edge: What Investors Should Watch as Trump's Trade Policy Turns Unpredictable
The Court won the legal battle, but tariffs advanced in practice. For investors attempting to interpret what this sequence of events means for markets, the priority is not forecasting an ultimate outcome. Legal contestation and policy fluidity make prediction challenging. A more constructive approach is to identify the economic and market indicators that now carry the clearest signal of risk and opportunity.
The New Tariff Regime: What Is Actually in Place
Before assessing market impact, it is important to separate signal from noise. The Supreme Court ruling invalidated tariffs imposed under IEEPA, including broad reciprocal duties that had dominated trade headlines since April 2025. The decision was narrowly scoped, leaving existing Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminium and Section 301 tariffs on Chinese imports intact.
Within hours, the administration moved to invoke Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, a balance-of-payments provision never previously used for tariffs. A flat 10% duty took effect on 24 February, with escalation toward the 15% statutory ceiling signalled over the weekend. While the effective U.S. tariff rate has declined from IEEPA-era levels, the framework is temporary, expiring after 150 days unless extended by Congress. Policymakers have indicated the intention to layer Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs on top, changing the architecture while keeping the policy direction intact.
Investors should also track potential refunds on IEEPA tariffs. Estimates suggest U.S. importers could be owed substantial repayments, though the timeline is uncertain. The durability of Section 122 itself is also untested. The statute was designed to address currency imbalances rather than trade deficits, raising the possibility of further legal challenge and adding uncertainty to the policy environment.
Sector-level exposure is also evolving. Technology, consumer goods, automotive, and industrial sectors are particularly sensitive to changes in input costs under the new tariff framework. Companies with high import intensity or global supply chains could face margin pressure, while those producing domestically or sourcing from exempt jurisdictions may see limited impact. For investors, the distributional effect across sectors will be a critical determinant of portfolio risk.
What Markets Are Telling Us Right Now
The initial market response has been notable less for its magnitude than for its restraint. Global equities absorbed the news without broad risk-off selling. European indices opened modestly weaker before stabilising, U.S. futures dipped and recovered, and on the ASX, the new tariffs prompted a short rotation into defensive assets such as gold. There has been no panic or repeat of the sharp drawdowns seen after the April 2025 reciprocal tariffs.
Equities appear to be pricing in a disruptive but manageable tariff environment. This assumption depends heavily on the 150-day window resolving without further escalation. The first meaningful data points will emerge during March and April earnings season, when U.S. consumer-facing companies report the realised margin impact of higher import costs. Forward guidance from these updates will provide early insight into whether the market’s relative calm reflects confidence or growing complacency.
Currency and bond markets are adjusting. The U.S. dollar has softened, reflecting the stagflationary pressures tariffs introduce, which raise costs while suppressing growth. Inflation expectations across developed markets have risen slightly, affecting monetary policy outlooks and potentially delaying the anticipated path for rate cuts. Central bank statements over the next month will be closely watched for any shift in language around inflation persistence or growth expectations.
Gold continues to trade near record highs, supported by policy uncertainty and central bank accumulation rather than purely as an inflation hedge. Emerging markets present a divergence opportunity, as economies positioned to benefit from supply chain reallocation attract incremental capital inflows. Conversely, Europe represents a potential escalation risk. Any retaliatory action from the European Union could trigger more significant global trade disruption than seen so far, particularly in sectors reliant on transatlantic trade.
Commodity markets will also provide critical signals. Tariffs affect global shipping costs, input prices, and manufacturing margins, which ripple through energy and resource demand. Observing these indicators provides early insight into the economic impact of trade policy before official GDP or earnings data are released.
Scenarios for the Next 150 Days
The 150-day clock is the most important variable in global markets. Almost everything else is secondary to this central signal.
The
bull case sees Congress declining to extend Section 122, allowing tariffs to lapse and providing a clear signal of trade normalisation. Political realities make this scenario unlikely. With midterm elections approaching, few legislators are willing to take responsibility for repealing tariffs, making a legislative rollback challenging.
The base case, aligned with the administration’s stated intentions, envisions the 150-day period being used to consolidate a patchwork of durable tariffs under Sections 232 and 301. Markets are likely to grind sideways amid policy uncertainty, punctuated by occasional rallies and sell-offs as negotiations with individual trading partners evolve.
The bear case involves a full escalation spiral. Retaliation by the EU, a measured response from China, and a fragmentation of the global trade system could revive stagflationary pressures. This outcome is underpriced in current equity valuations, offering little compensation for a major trade shock.
Congressional positioning over May and June will provide the clearest indicator. Public statements regarding the July vote will offer early warning of potential outcomes, allowing investors to anticipate market direction before formal policy decisions.
What Australian Investors Should Specifically Watch
For Australian investors, direct exposure to Section 122 tariffs is limited. Critical minerals, LNG, and major agricultural exports remain exempt. However, the exemption list is fluid. Any revision could affect export earnings and related companies, creating immediate portfolio impact.
Indirect risks are more significant. Australia’s economy is sensitive to global commodity demand and Chinese industrial activity. A slowdown in China could weigh on iron ore, compressing earnings for BHP, Rio Tinto, and Fortescue, and affecting the ASX 200 and federal revenues. NAB’s head of FX strategy Ray Attrill described the tariff escalation as negative for the Australian dollar, reflecting combined headwinds from slower growth and tariff-driven cost pressures.
Key indicators include monthly iron ore prices and Chinese manufacturing PMI. A sustained decline in the AUD/USD would indicate risk-off pressures outweighing commodity support and may prompt a review of offshore hedging.
The Reserve Bank of Australia faces a more complex policy environment, balancing persistent domestic inflation against slower global growth and external tariff-driven pressures. Mentions of international inflation in the March statement could influence expectations for rate adjustments in 2026.
Australian investors should also review offshore equity exposures in superannuation portfolios, particularly U.S. consumer, retail, and technology holdings vulnerable to margin compression. On the upside, unresolved IEEPA refunds represent a potential earnings tailwind for U.S. multinationals, which could indirectly benefit Australian investors through international allocations. Understanding these exposures is essential for portfolio management.
Strategic Considerations for Investors
In a volatile policy environment, clarity on the outcome of the 150-day Section 122 window is unlikely before 24 July. Positioning across a range of potential scenarios allows investors to manage risk while maintaining flexibility amid uncertainty.
Avoid chasing relief rallies. Equity markets have absorbed the tariff news with composure, but this rests on the base case resolving benignly. The 15% Section 122 tariff is live, legally contested, and carries escalation risk. Buying the headline rather than the underlying reality is risky.
Stress-test against the bear case, not just the base. EU retaliation, Chinese counter-measures, and a stagflation impulse remain underpriced in current valuations. Modest resilience measures now are cheaper than reacting once the scenario materialises.
Reassess fixed income duration. Tariff-driven inflation introduces upside risk to yields. Investors with long-duration exposure may consider shifting toward shorter-duration or inflation-linked instruments until the July outcome is clear.
Treat gold as strategic allocation. Current drivers, central bank accumulation, a weaker U.S. dollar, and policy uncertainty, are structural. Maintaining a modest allocation provides genuine diversification if equities and bonds face simultaneous headwinds.
Look at emerging market divergence as an active opportunity.
Vietnam, India, and Mexico are genuine trade diversion beneficiaries attracting real capital inflows. Investors with existing EM exposure should consider whether it is positioned toward these supply chain winners or inadvertently concentrated in directly exposed economies.
Use the May–June signalling window actively. Public statements on the July vote offer early visibility. This 60-daywindow should inform tactical allocation decisions rather than be treated as background noise.
Avoid over-trading the news cycle. Headlines will be frequent. Investors who define scenarios, set clear triggers, and maintain discipline will navigate volatility more effectively than those reacting to daily developments.
Bottom Line
The trade conflict did not end on 20 February. It shifted jurisdiction, moved to a new statutory framework, and became more costly for global importers than before the Supreme Court ruling. The key takeaway is that the administration’s commitment to tariffs as a core policy tool is sufficient to absorb a legal setback and reconstitute the framework under a new statute.
In a context of uncertainty, forecasting the final outcome is less valuable than monitoring relevant signals. Investors should know what to watch, when to watch it, and how each signal affects portfolios.
For Australian investors, the direct impact is manageable, but indirect and structural risks remain underpriced. The most critical variable, the outcome of the 150-day period ending 24 July, remains unresolved. Market calm does not necessarily indicate accuracy. Vigilance, analysis, and scenario planning remain essential.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Disclaimer: This article does not constitute financial advice nor a recommendation to invest in the securities listed. The information presented is intended to be of a factual nature only. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. As always, do your own research and consider seeking financial, legal and taxation advice before investing.
About Ferrari NV Ferrari N.V., through its subsidiaries, engages in design, engineering, production, and sale of luxury performance sports cars worldwide. The company offers sports, track, one-off, and road cars, as well as supercars. It also provides spare parts and engines, as well as after sales, repair, maintenance, and restoration services for cars; and licenses its Ferrari brand to various producers and retailers of luxury and lifestyle goods. In addition, the company operates Ferrari museums in Modena and Maranello; Il Cavallino restaurant in Maranello; and theme parks in Abu Dhabi and Spain. Further, it provides direct or indirect finance and leasing services; range of financial and ancillary services; special financing arrangements; and operates franchised and owned Ferrari stores. The company was founded in 1947 and is headquartered in Maranello, Italy. Source:EODHD Key Stats
In volatile markets, discipline matters most. Learn how dollar-cost averaging supports systematic capital deployment and reduces timing risk.
About Amazon.com Inc Amazon.com, Inc. engages in the retail sale of consumer products, advertising, and subscriptions service through online and physical stores in North America and internationally. The company operates through three segments: North America, International, and Amazon Web Services (AWS). It also manufactures and sells electronic devices, including Kindle, fire tablets, fire TVs, echo, ring, blink, and eero; and develops and produces media content. In addition, the company offers programs that enable sellers to sell their products in its stores; and programs that allow authors, independent publishers, musicians, filmmakers, Twitch streamers, skill and app developers, and others to publish and sell content. Further, it provides compute, storage, Artificial intelligence, database, analytics, machine learning, and other services, as well as advertising services through programs, such as sponsored ads, display, and video advertising. Additionally, the company offers Amazon Prime, a membership program. The company's products offered through its stores include merchandise and content purchased for resale and products offered by third-party sellers. It serves consumers, sellers, developers, enterprises, content creators, advertisers, and employees. The company was incorporated in 1994 and is headquartered in Seattle, Washington. Source:EODHD Key Stats
Understand how defensive investing can manage risk, generate stable income, and help you pursue consistent, long-term growth in uncertain markets.
Assess how Australia’s higher-for-longer rate environment impacts markets, assets, and portfolios, with insights on navigating risks and opportunities.
About Alphabet Inc Alphabet Inc. offers various products and platforms in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia-Pacific, Canada, and Latin America. It operates through Google Services, Google Cloud, and Other Bets segments. The Google Services segment provides products and services, including ads, Android, Chrome, devices, Gmail, Google Drive, Google Maps, Google Photos, Google Play, Search, and YouTube. It is also involved in the sale of apps and in-app purchases and digital content in Google Play and YouTube; and devices, as well as the provision of YouTube consumer subscription services, such as YouTube TV, YouTube Music and Premium, NFL Sunday Ticket, and Google One. The Google Cloud segment offers consumption-based fees and subscriptions for AI solutions, including AI infrastructure, Vertex AI platform, and Gemini enterprise. It also provides cybersecurity, and data and analytics services; Google Workspace that include cloud-based communication and collaboration tools for enterprises, such as Calendar, Gmail, Docs, Drive, and Meet; and other enterprise services. The Other Bets segment sells transportation and internet services. Alphabet Inc. was incorporated in 1998 and is headquartered in Mountain View, California. Source: EODHD Key Stats
Borrowing capital to invest remains the most effective tool available to sophisticated investors seeking to accelerate portfolio growth, yet it is often misunderstood as a "high-stakes gamble." Leverage amplifies your purchasing power, transforming a standard portfolio into a dynamic engine for wealth creation. While the concept of "risk-free" leverage is a mathematical impossibility, the ability to manage risk with institutional-grade precision is entirely achievable. Smart investors do not fear debt because they understand how to structure it as a calculated business strategy rather than a speculative bet. They respect the mechanics of gearing and employ professional oversight to mitigate the downside while capturing the upside of global markets. In 2026, the question isn't just about whether you should use leverage, but how you manage the journey from research to results. By moving away from "set-and-forget" retail habits and adopting an evidence-based framework, you can replace the anxiety of the unknown with the confidence of a professional strategy. How does margin lending work? Margin lending is a strategic tool that allows you to borrow capital to invest in approved shares, using your existing portfolio or cash as security. This creates a Loan-to-Value Ratio (LVR), which dictates your borrowing capacity against specific assets. While the lender holds security over the portfolio, the investor retains beneficial ownership and receives all dividends and franking credits. The mathematics of leverage are compelling when executed with professional-grade research and risk management. Consider a share-specific example: Initial Equity : You start with $100,000 in cash or existing blue-chip shares. The Leverage : You borrow an additional $100,000 to increase your total market exposure to $200,000. The Outcome : If the market rises by 10%, your total portfolio is now worth $220,000. The Professional Result : Instead of a $10,000 gain on your initial cash, you have achieved a $20,000 gain, representing a 20% return on your initial equity (before interest costs). When your portfolio value increases, the gains on the larger asset base belong entirely to you. Furthermore, for high-income earners, the interest on the loan is generally tax-deductible, making the effective cost of borrowing highly attractive. Why do investors fear the margin call? For many investors, the term "margin call" triggers a visceral reaction, often rooted in the "psychological scars" of past share market volatility, where unmanaged debt led to significant capital impairment. A margin call occurs when the market value of your shares falls below the lender's required LVR, forcing you to either contribute immediate cash or sell assets at depressed prices to restore the balance. This mechanism protects the lender but can devastate an unmanaged, "set-and-forget" portfolio. This fear typically stems from a lack of active, professional portfolio management. When you rely on a passive strategy while holding debt, you surrender control to market forces exactly when you need discipline and data-led execution the most. The Sharewise approach to mitigating risk: Proactive market monitoring : Our Chief Investment Officer looks at 5,000 stocks across all markets every day, ensuring we identify shifts before they become critical threats to your LVR. Data-driven discipline : We utilise technical and fundamental analysis to remove emotional "hope" from the equation, implementing strict protocols to protect your capital. Constant communication : Every investor has a dedicated advisor providing one-on-one communication, ensuring you are never left guessing during market corrections. Absolute transparency : Through our managed account structure, you can log in 24/7 to see exactly how your portfolio and leverage are performing, maintaining control with confidence. What is margin lending vs margin loan? Choosing the right debt structure for growth means moving beyond a basic comparison of loan types to understanding exactly how your facility is managed. While these terms are often used interchangeably in financial headlines, there is a strategic difference that every professional investor should recognise. Margin lending refers to the broader program or strategy of borrowing against securities to amplify your investment capacity. In contrast, a margin loan is the specific debt instrument or credit facility you use to execute that strategy. Understanding this distinction is vital for managing your LVR and maintaining absolute control over your financial future. Margin Lending (The Strategy): This is the overarching framework of borrowing to invest, technically known as "gearing". It requires institutional-grade research and constant vigilance to ensure your leverage supports growth without creating unmanaged risk. Margin Loan (The Product): This is the actual line of credit that carries the interest rate. When you are searching for the best margin lending rates, you are effectively comparing the cost of different margin loan facilities against the potential performance of your shares. By focusing on the margin lending strategy as a whole, rather than just the margin loan balance, you ensure your borrowing is supported by proactive market monitoring rather than just passive debt. Why margin lending outperforms generic debt When seeking to accelerate wealth, the choice of borrowing is just as critical as the choice of shares themselves. While many investors consider standard debt products, margin lending is specifically engineered for the equity market, offering a level of institutional-grade precision that generic borrowing cannot match. Choosing margin lending over other vessels of borrowing is a strategic decision for the serious investor. While personal loans or bank overdrafts can technically be used to buy shares, they are "blunt instruments" not designed for market dynamics. Risk Mitigation: Personal loans and overdrafts have no built-in LVR monitoring. Margin lending, when paired with professional portfolio management, includes daily oversight to ensure market dips don't become financial disasters. Tax Efficiency: In Australia, interest on a margin loan used to acquire income-producing shares is generally tax-deductible. While other loans can be deductible if used solely for investing, the administrative burden of "tracing" those funds is complex compared to a purpose-built margin lending facility. Cost of Capital: Because margin lending is secured against a liquid share portfolio, lenders often provide the best margin lending rates, whereas personal loans are unsecured and carry significantly higher interest costs that can eat into your investment performance. Cash Flow & Liquidity: An overdraft often requires rigid repayment schedules. Margin lending offers the flexibility to pay interest from dividends or capitalise it into the loan, allowing your share portfolio to compound more efficiently. Securing the best margin lending rates is only the first step; the real value lies in the active management of those funds. By moving away from "passive debt" and embracing a managed account structure, you transform a simple loan into a sophisticated utility for market outperformance. The path to risk-aware leverage While no investment is devoid of risk, the fundamental difference between reckless gambling and strategic gearing lies in the professional management framework. Securing the best margin lending rates is only the first step; the real value lies in the active management of those funds to ensure your share portfolio consistently outperforms the cost of debt. Professional advisors and investment managers utilise managed accounts to monitor LVR levels daily. This vigilance ensures that minor market dips are addressed before they become critical margin calls, providing professional portfolio management without losing control. The historical data supports a strategic approach; while Australian shares have delivered strong long-term averages, the real "profit margin" for the investor is the spread between the cost of debt and the potential return. Because interest on investment loans is generally tax-deductible for Australian residents, the real cost of holding a leveraged position is significantly lower than the headline rate. Risk aware leverage involves three core pillars: Conservative LVRs: Never borrowing to the maximum limit allows a buffer for market volatility. Diversification : Spreading capital across unconnected sectors reduces the likelihood of the entire portfolio dropping simultaneously. Active Management: Using a professional service to rebalance the portfolio proactively rather than reactively. To truly understand how professional management protects your capital, compare the Sharewise institutional approach against the typical retail experience:
For the high net worth Australian investor, "safety" is often a mislabeled form of concentration. While many high-net-worth individuals have successfully accumulated wealth, their portfolios frequently remain anchored to the familiar: residential property and the "Big Four" banks. This creates a structural imbalance where investment performance is inextricably tied to a single, resource-heavy economy and the local interest rate cycle. Achieving true diversification requires accepting a stark reality. The Australian Securities Exchange represents less than 2% of the global equity market. To ignore the remaining 98% is a strategic decision to cap potential returns while doubling down on local risks. Real wealth preservation demands an agnostic strategy that prioritises data over geography. However, the modern professional is often time-poor, possessing the capital for growth but lacking the hours required to analyse complex, global datasets. In this article, we examine how high-net-worth investors can construct resilient, performance-led asset allocations through global equities and alternative investments, the difference between genuine diversification and hidden concentration risk, and how the Sharewise methodology is designed to compound wealth beyond the ASX by applying institutional-grade discipline to private portfolios.
About CAR Group Limited. CAR Group Limited engages in the online vehicle marketplace business in Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, South Korea, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Chile, China, and North America. The company operates through six segments: Australia " Online Advertising Services; Australia " Data, Research and Services; Investments; North America; Latin America; and Asia segments. It offers classified advertising that allows private and dealer customers to advertise automotive and non-automotive goods and services for sale across the carsales network; products, including subscriptions, lead fees, listing fees, and priority placement services; and display advertising services, such as placing advertisements for corporate customers comprising automotive manufacturers and finance companies. The company also provides software as a service, research and reporting, valuation, appraisals, and website development and hosting services, as well as photography services. In addition, it offers vehicle inspection services; operates digital automotive and non-automotive marketplaces; and offers automotive data and advertising services. The company was formerly known as carsales.com Ltd and changed its name to CAR Group Limited in November 2023. CAR Group Limited was incorporated in 1996 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia. Source: EODHD Key Stats
About Northern Star Resources Ltd. Northern Star Resources Limited engages in the exploration, development, mining, and processing of gold deposits. The company also sells refined gold. It operates in Western Australia, the Northern Territory, and Alaska. Northern Star Resources Limited was incorporated in 2000 and is headquartered in Subiaco, Australia. Source:EODHD Key Stats
