The Cold War for Chips – How the U.S.–China Tech Battle Is Reshaping Global Markets
Semiconductors are no longer just the backbone of consumer electronics. They have become a strategic resource shaping artificial intelligence, cloud infrastructure, defence systems and advanced manufacturing. Technology now defines national competitiveness, and the relationship between the United States and China has shifted from commercial rivalry to a contest centred on control of chip technology. What began as a race for manufacturing efficiency is now a geopolitical struggle with far-reaching implications for global capital flows, supply chains and market leadership. Investors monitoring these developments must understand how technology, infrastructure and policy intersect to shape long-term opportunities.
Where the Battle Is Being Fought in the Semiconductor Supply Chain
Competition between the U.S. and China is concentrated along three critical layers of the semiconductor value chain. The first is chip design. U.S. firms such as NVIDIA, AMD, Arm and Apple dominate high-end AI accelerators, edge processors and data-centre architectures. Their intellectual property ensures they remain essential to the global computing roadmap. These designs underpin frontier AI development, advanced defence systems and industrial automation, making design leadership a strategic chokepoint that China cannot easily replicate.
Fabrication is the second battleground. Taiwan, led by TSMC, remains the world’s most advanced producer of cutting-edge chips. Its leadership at 3 nanometres, with plans for 2 nanometres, places it at the centre of geopolitical attention. No alternative producer matches its scale or technical capability, creating strategic dependence and concentration risk. South Korea plays a similarly critical role in memory and advanced logic production. Any disruption in these hubs would have immediate consequences for cloud computing, AI development and broader digital infrastructure.
The third layer is semiconductor manufacturing equipment, which represents the industrial hard power of the sector. ASML, Applied Materials, Tokyo Electron and Lam Research control the lithography, deposition and etching tools required to build advanced chips. Because these firms operate in U.S.-aligned economies, the U.S. can restrict China’s access to key equipment. Limits on EUV and advanced DUV systems have slowed China’s progress at the frontier and highlight how manufacturing equipment has become one of the most strategically influential parts of the supply chain.
U.S. Strategy: Containment Through Technology Denial
The U.S. has adopted a containment strategy that uses technology access as a strategic lever. Export controls introduced since 2022 restrict China’s access to advanced GPUs, lithography platforms and specialised design software, aiming to limit China’s capabilities in frontier AI models and high-performance computing. Companies have been required to modify products or withdraw them entirely from China when performance thresholds exceed the controlled limits.
This approach is reinforced by domestic investment. The CHIPS and Science Act allocates more than USD 50 billion to expand U.S. fabrication, strengthen advanced packaging and accelerate R&D. The goal is to rebuild strategic elements of the supply chain, reduce reliance on overseas foundries and maintain U.S. leadership in defence-relevant technologies.
Alliance alignment strengthens this strategy. Japan and the Netherlands control essential lithography and materials technologies, while Taiwan and South Korea provide global leading-edge manufacturing capacity. Through coordinated export controls, the U.S. has expanded the reach of its restrictions and increased the effectiveness of its containment effort.
China’s Countermove: Self-Sufficiency and Import Substitution
China has accelerated its goal of building a domestic semiconductor ecosystem capable of operating independently from U.S. influence. National and provincial programs have committed an estimated USD 150–200 billion to expand fabrication, strengthen memory production, support local design houses and build domestic equipment capability. Progress at 28 and 40 nanometres has been significant, enabling China to scale output for automotive, industrial and consumer applications.
Still, China remains several generations behind at the leading edge. EUV systems remain inaccessible due to export restrictions, and domestic alternatives are not yet competitive. China is developing its own AI accelerators to replace restricted U.S. chips, but performance gaps persist. At the same time, China is also strengthening ties with regions willing to expand technology cooperation, including parts of Southeast Asia and the Middle East. The long-term aim is an end-to-end semiconductor supply chain that can function independently of foreign pressure.
The AI Power Bottleneck: Data Centres, Energy and Infrastructure Limits
The rapid growth of AI is creating a new constraint across the semiconductor ecosystem: data-centre power and infrastructure capacity. Global electricity demand from data centres is forecast to more than double by 2030, reaching around 945 TWh annually, with AI servers contributing nearly half of this growth. In the U.S., data-centre electricity usage is expected to rise 165% by 2030 relative to 2023, and by 2035, peak power demand linked to AI workloads may exceed 100 GW. These figures highlight how quickly power availability and grid readiness are becoming limiting factors.
AI workloads also require far more energy- and cooling-intensive infrastructure. GPU-optimised racks typically draw 40–60 kW, with high-density configurations surpassing 100 kW. This places pressure on electricity grids, substation buildouts, water usage and permitting processes. As a result, the constraints around AI deployment are shifting from chip availability to data-centre readiness. Regions with flexible power supply and supportive regulatory frameworks may capture a greater share of AI investment, while areas facing energy bottlenecks could experience delays in hardware deployment and uneven semiconductor demand.
Market Implications: Winners and Losers
The evolving semiconductor landscape is creating differentiated opportunities and risks. U.S. chip designers and memory suppliers are benefiting from strong AI-driven demand, with GPU accelerators, high-bandwidth memory and advanced packaging in multi-year expansion cycles. Equipment suppliers across Europe, Japan and the United States are also well positioned, supported by global capex expected to reach USD 374 billion between 2026 and 2028. China is seeing selective growth in mature-node fabrication, memory and domestic AI accelerators as it accelerates import substitution.
Pressure points are emerging as well. Rapid investment in mature-node capacity raises the risk of oversupply in 28 and 40 nanometre nodes by 2026, which could compress margins for Chinese foundries. Companies with significant exposure to China, or whose products sit near export-control thresholds, face regulatory uncertainty and higher compliance costs. Taiwan and South Korea remain essential to leading-edge production but carry heightened geopolitical sensitivity due to their strategic position in the supply chain.
The AI power bottleneck introduces a new layer of market divergence. Even as chip supply improves, AI hardware deployment may become uneven across regions depending on power availability and infrastructure readiness. Markets with favourable energy policy and grid capacity may see accelerated semiconductor demand, while constrained regions risk slower rollouts. This dynamic is shaping competitive positioning across the industry.
Investor Considerations
Two themes are likely to guide investor positioning. The first is supply-chain resilience. Companies with diversified manufacturing across the United States, Japan, South Korea, India and Southeast Asia are better insulated from policy shocks and geopolitical tension. Those concentrated in a single high-risk region face greater exposure to delays, regulatory intervention and restricted access to advanced technologies.
The second theme is the rise of two distinct technology ecosystems. As U.S. and Chinese standards diverge, companies operating in both markets must redesign products, navigate complex compliance requirements and adapt their long-term strategies. Firms that adjust early may secure stronger competitive positions, while those slow to respond may lose market access.
Semiconductor equipment suppliers remain a structural growth opportunity. Governments and corporations are expanding fabrication capacity, driving sustained demand for lithography, etching, metrology and packaging tools. The scale-up of AI infrastructure reinforces this demand, particularly in high-bandwidth memory, GPU accelerators and advanced packaging.
Investors should also monitor constraints outside chip manufacturing. AI data centres are increasingly limited by power availability, cooling capacity and network infrastructure. These bottlenecks may influence hardware demand and shape semiconductor supply-demand dynamics.
Conclusion
The U.S.–China semiconductor conflict has transformed chips from a specialised industry into a strategic asset affecting national security, energy planning and global market behaviour. Both countries are vying for leadership in AI and advanced manufacturing, directing capital toward regions and companies with genuine technological depth, resilient supply chains and infrastructure capable of supporting accelerating AI demand.
Over the next decade, the emergence of parallel technology ecosystems, sustained investment in AI infrastructure, and energy capacity expansion will redefine global market leadership. Understanding how geopolitics, power constraints and semiconductor capabilities interact will be central to long-term investment positioning. Regions with favourable policy, robust infrastructure and leading-edge technology will likely capture a disproportionate share of AI-driven growth, shaping competitive and financial outcomes well beyond 2030.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Disclaimer: This article does not constitute financial advice nor a recommendation to invest in the securities listed. The information presented is intended to be of a factual nature only. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. As always, do your own research and consider seeking financial, legal and taxation advice before investing.
A clear look at how rare earths drive EVs, wind power and AI hardware, and what supply constraints mean for long-term investment themes.
About Medtronic Plc Medtronic plc develops, manufactures, and sells device-based medical therapies to healthcare systems, physicians, clinicians, and patients in the United States, Ireland, and internationally. The Cardiovascular Portfolio segment offers implantable cardiac pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices; cardiac ablation products; insertable cardiac monitor systems; TYRX products; and remote monitoring and patient-centered software. It also provides aortic valves, surgical valve replacement and repair products, endovascular stent grafts and accessories, and transcatheter pulmonary valves, and percutaneous coronary intervention products, percutaneous angioplasty balloons, and other products. The Neuroscience Portfolio segment offers medical devices and implants, biologic solutions, spinal cord stimulation and brain modulation systems, implantable drug infusion systems, and interventional products, as well as nerve ablation system under the Accurian name. The segment offers its products for spinal surgeons, neurosurgeons, neurologists, pain management specialists, anesthesiologists, orthopedic surgeons, urologists, urogynecologists, and interventional radiologists, as well as ear, nose, and throat specialists, and energy surgical instruments. The Medical Surgical Portfolio segment offers surgical stapling devices, vessel sealing instruments, wound closure and electrosurgery products, AI-powered surgical video and analytics platform, robotic-assisted surgery products, hernia mechanical devices, mesh implants, gynecology products, gastrointestinal and hepatologic diagnostics and therapies, and therapies to treat diseases and conditions, and patient monitoring and airway management products. The Diabetes Operating Unit segment provides insulin pumps and consumables, continuous glucose monitoring systems and sensors, and InPen, a smart insulin pen. Medtronic plc was founded in 1949 and is headquartered in Galway, Ireland. Key Stats
The Fed’s latest rate cut marks a key shift in policy. Explore its impact on global markets, inflation risks, and how investors should position heading into 2026.
About Waste Management Inc Waste Management, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides environmental solutions to residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal customers in the United States, Canada, Western Europe, and internationally. It offers collection services, including picking up and transporting waste and recyclable materials from where it was generated to a transfer station, recovery facility, or disposal site; owns and operates transfer stations; and owns, develops, and operates landfill gas-to-energy facilities that produce renewable electricity and renewable natural gas. It also operates materials processing and commodities recycling services, including cardboard, paper, glass, metals, plastics, construction and demolition materials, and other recycling commodities are recovered for resale or redirected for other purposes; recycling brokerage services, such as managing the marketing of recyclable materials for third parties; and other strategic business solutions. In addition, the company collects recyclable food and yard waste, as well as markets and sells mulch, compost, soil amendments, and renewable energy; offers remediation and construction, and industrial waste services; and manages and markets fly ash. Further, it provides Regulated Waste and Compliance Services (RWCS), which offers compliance programs, as well as collection, processing, and disposal of regulated and specialized waste, including medical, pharmaceutical, and hazardous waste; and Secure Information Destruction (SID) services that includes the collection of personal and confidential information for secure destruction and recycling of sorted office paper. The company was formerly known as USA Waste Services, Inc. and changed its name to Waste Management, Inc. in 1998. Waste Management, Inc. was founded in 1968 and is based in Houston, Texas. Key Stats
Insights on the Fed’s next move, market implications and what investors should expect heading into 2026.
As December unfolds, explore the Santa Claus Rally and uncover its drivers, risks, and potential impact on investors this year.
About Xero Ltd Xero Limited, together with its subsidiaries, provides online business solutions for small businesses and their advisors in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, North America, and internationally. It offers accounting, payroll, payments and other solutions through its Xero platform. The company also provides Planday, an online employee scheduling software; Hubdoc for bills and receipts; Syft, which creates reports, forecasts, dashboards, and consolidations with AI insights; TaxCycle, a tax preparation software for accountants and bookkeepers; and Tickstar, an e-invoicing product. Xero Limited was incorporated in 2006 and is headquartered in Wellington, New Zealand. Key Stats
Discover why Centuria shares are a top ASX income stock, offering stable dividends & growth potential. Stay informed on Centuria’s opportunities & risks.
Fortescue Ltd (FMG) stock insights: Explore growth, dividends, risks & investor strategies for long-term returns. Read our complete Stock Spotlight today!
Stay updated on Westpac Banking Corporation (ASX:WBC) with stock updates, technical analysis, forecasts & insights. See if WBC aligns with your investment goals.
